Search for: "EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 7:14 am
An interesting article in the Los Angeles Times on Exide Technologies’ Vernon, CA smelter (think just south of downtown Los Angeles) that shows, somewhat, the interplay of civil enforcement, criminal enforcement, local activism and political pressure: http://www.latimes.com/science/la-me-exide-violations-20150310-story.html: "The latest EPA citations against Exide stem from an investigation that includes the agency's Criminal Enforcement… [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 12:32 pm
On March 12, 2015, Exide Technologies announced that it will permanently close its lead-acid battery recycling facility in Vernon, CA under the terms of a non-prosecution agreement reached with the USAO for the Central District of California. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 7:45 pm
Exide Technologies will pay $45,000 to settle a disability discrimination lawsuit filed by the EEOC. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Exide Technologies Inc., one of the premier manufacturers of car and truck batteries, has filed for bankruptcy protection through Chapter 11. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 11:40 am
It’s a busy week within the executive ranks at Exide Technologies (XIDE). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Exide Technologies, Civ. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
Exide Technologies, the Tenth Circuit affirmed summary judgment in favor of Exide Technologies, dismissing Peterson's Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and wrongful discharge claims as a matter of law. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:40 am
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, June 01, 2010 In re Exide Technologies, --- F.3d --- (3rd Cir 2010)(agreement to sell substantially all of its industrial battery business is not an executory contract because it does not contain at least one... [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:38 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the In re: Exide Technologies case may give some trademark licensees new hope of retaining their license rights even in bankruptcy. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
Exide Technologies, Inc. and The Wattles Co., No. 1:16-CV-1600-MHC (N.D. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:43 am
On August 7, 2014, the securities suit filed against Exide Technologies and certain of its directors and officers based on the defendants’ allegedly misleading statements about the company’s compliance with environmental regulations became the latest environmental disclosure securities suits to overcome the initial pleading hurdles. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 1:47 pm
See In re Exide Technologies, 607 F.3d 957, 964 (3d Cir. 2010), as amended (June 24, 2010) (Ambro, J., concurring). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 11:34 pm
(CALD): buy below $4.90 (new price).Exide Technologies (XIDE): buy below $5.50.Ballantyne Strong (BTN): buy on pullbacks below $8.75.Education Realty Trust (EDR): buy below $7.50.Paragon Shipping (PRGN): buy up to $4.10.PRGX Global (PRGX): buy on any pullbacks, up to $5.75. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:04 pm
That’s exactly what happened to Exide Technologies, Inc. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:41 am
Arizona, where he explicitly expresses disappointment with a suspect after the suspect has made a clear invocation of the right to counsel.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Louisiana)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply Today’s second petition of the day is: Title: Exide Technologies v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
In Exide Technologies v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:53 pm
Exide Technologies, a Kansas battery maker, faces $149K fine over lead hazards for failing to protect workers from overexposure to lead at its manufacturing plant in Kansas. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:53 pm
Exide Technologies, a Kansas battery maker, faces $149K fine over lead hazards for failing to protect workers from overexposure to lead at its manufacturing plant in Kansas. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:27 am
In a concurring opinion in Exide Technologies, Judge Ambro went further, concluding that rejection of a trademark license should not deprive the licensee of all rights. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 10:40 pm
Looking at Third Circuit precedent, it examined Judge Ambro’s concurrence in the Third Circuit’s 2010 decision in In re Exide Technologies. [read post]
